Peter Due, Special Representative and Head of the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), told the Security Council during his first briefing inside the iconic chamber on Thursday that while the December 2025 polls featured broad participation, the momentum is being tested.
Speaking in New York, Mr. Due noted that the process of electing a new President remains incomplete, following a year of political stalemate.
Building trust on the ground
Mr Due – who took the key role three months ago – emphasised that the return of Kosovo Serb mayors in the north was a positive step yet warned of “challenges” including administrative gaps and language barriers.
“These are not merely technical issues,” he said, urging continued engagement. Guided by Resolution 1244 (1999), UNMIK is focusing its efforts on community-level dialogue.
“Trust among communities, and between communities and institutions, allows progress, dialogue and cooperation to take root,” he stressed.
The mission itself is navigating a UN-wide liquidity crisis, having reduced encumbered positions by nearly 30 per cent. Despite these financial constraints, Mr Due insisted the mission remains vital in fostering an inclusive culture “where every community sees itself reflected in the path forward”.
Diverging paths: Belgrade vs Pristina
The debate underscored a fundamental rift between Serbia and Kosovo regarding the UN’s ongoing role.
- Serbia: Foreign Minister Marko Ðurić defended UNMIK as a “key guarantee of peace” and the protector of the rights of Serbs in Kosovo. Warning against any reduction in the UN presence, he stated: “The oppression of a community does not happen overnight…Serbia is not part of the problem. We are part of the solution.”
- Kosovo: Foreign Affairs Minister Glauk Konjufca argued that UNMIK’s mandate is “completed”. He accused Belgrade of playing a “disruptive role” and attempting to deny the region integration into Euro-Atlantic structures. “The focus should not be on having the United Nations in Kosova through UNMIK, but on admitting Kosova into the United Nations,” he said.
International friction
The Council remains split on whether the mission has outlived its purpose.
The United States representative argued there is “no justification for treating Kosovo in 2026 as though it were still the Kosovo of 1999,” describing UNMIK as an “overfunded peacekeeping mission without peacekeepers” that has reached “the end of the road”.
Conversely, the European Union focused on the long-term horizon, urging both parties to commit to EU-facilitated reforms. The EU representative noted that progress toward normalisation remains an “essential condition” for both parties’ aspirations, adding: “The future of both Serbia and Kosovo is firmly embedded within the European Union.”
The session concluded with calls for both sides to choose “patience over provocation,” as the Council weighs a potential strategic review of a mission that has defined the region’s security landscape for over a quarter-century.
For more an in-depth story check out our Meetings Coverage Section report here.
